//set this to the number of criteria!!! numberofcriteria = 7; numberofranges = 7; optionrange= new Array(); optionrange[0]="Select option..."; optionrange[1]="100-80 (Outstanding)"; optionrange[2]="79-70 (Excellent)"; optionrange[3]="69-60 (Good)"; optionrange[4]="59-50 (Pass)"; optionrange[5]="49-40 (Fail)"; optionrange[6]="39-0 (Bad Fail, Poor Attempt)"; var criteria1 = new Array(); var criteria2 = new Array(); var criteria3 = new Array(); var criteria4 = new Array(); var criteria5 = new Array(); var criteria6 = new Array(); var criteria7 = new Array(); marksavailable1 = 20; criteria1[0] = "1. Introduction "; criteria1[1] = "Outstandingly insightful description and justification of all aspects relating to the product and pathway, presented. Exemplary case for therapeutic value proposition (TVP), outlined. "; criteria1[2] = "Very good description and justification of all aspects relating to the product and pathway, presented. Excellent case for TVP, defined. "; criteria1[3] = "Good description of all or most aspects relating to the product and pathway, presented. Missed one or two justifications but a good case for TVP, presented. "; criteria1[4] = "Acceptable description of all aspects relating to the product and pathway, outlined. Missed a few minor justifications but acceptable case for TVP, presented. "; criteria1[5] = "Inadequate description aspects relating to the product and pathway, with partial descriptions justifications. Case for TVP, unclear, inadequately presented. "; criteria1[6] = "Limited or no description of the decision problem. Limited or no case for TVP, presented. "; marksavailable2 = 20; criteria2[0] = "2. Clinical Effectiveness Evidence "; criteria2[1] = "Clear question; principles and methodological approach appropriate, substantially justified and clearly described. Excellent identification and selection of highly relevant evidence. Sophisticated/rigorous quality assessment and analytical synthesis. Perceptive critique and summary of evidence. Excellent link to TVP. "; criteria2[2] = "Clear question; principles and methodological approach appropriate, well justified and clearly described. Comprehensive identification and selection of relevant evidence. Excellent quality assessment and analytical synthesis. Excellent critique and summary of evidence. Very good link to TVP. "; criteria2[3] = "Clear question; principles and methodological approach appropriate, justified and clearly described. Good identification and selection of relevant evidence. Good quality assessment and analytical synthesis. Good critique and summary of evidence. Good link to TVP. "; criteria2[4] = "Basic but clear question; principles and methodological approach described, but weak, limited or no justification. Acceptable identification and selection of relevant evidence. Acceptable/basic quality assessment and analysis. Acceptable/standard critique and summary of evidence. Vague link to TVP. "; criteria2[5] = "Question unclear; principles and methodological approach poorly described, with weak, limited or no justification. Incomplete identification and selection of relevant evidence. Poorly explained / described quality assessment and analysis. Poorly-described critique and summary of evidence. No or vague link to TVP. "; criteria2[6] = "No question; principles and methodological approach not stated. Identification and selection of evidence, inappropriate or inadequate. Limited or no presentation of quality assessment or analysis. Limited or no critique and summary of evidence. No link to TVP "; marksavailable3 = 10; criteria3[0] = "3. Trials design and outcome measures "; criteria3[1] = "Exceptional identification of population, intervention, comparators and outcomes relevant to the study. Excellent consideration of the key elements of trial and the linkages with the evidence base, model and TVP. "; criteria3[2] = "Comprehensive identification of population, intervention, comparators and outcomes relevant to the study. Insightful consideration of key elements of trial and the linkages with the evidence base, model and TVP. "; criteria3[3] = "Good identification of population, intervention, comparators and outcomes relevant to the study. Good/Appropriate consideration of key elements of trial and the linkages with the evidence base, model and TVP. "; criteria3[4] = "Standard/acceptable identification of population, intervention, comparators and outcomes relevant to the study. Basic consideration of key elements of trial and the linkages with the evidence base, model and TVP. "; criteria3[5] = "Casual / limited identification of population, intervention, comparators and outcomes relevant to the study. Casual / limited consideration of key elements of trial and the linkages with the evidence base, model and TVP. "; criteria3[6] = "Very limited / no identification of population, intervention, comparators or outcomes relevant to the study. Very limited / inappropriate consideration of key elements of trial and the linkages with the evidence base, model and TVP. "; marksavailable4 = 20; criteria4[0] = "4. Cost Effectiveness Evidence "; criteria4[1] = "Principles and methodological approach appropriate, substantially justified and clearly described. Excellent identification and selection of highly relevant evidence. Perceptive critique and summary of relevant evidence. "; criteria4[2] = "Principles and methodological approach appropriate, well justified and clearly described. Comprehensive identification and selection of relevant evidence. Excellent critique and summary of relevant evidence. "; criteria4[3] = "Principles and methodological approach appropriate, justified and described. Good identification and selection of relevant evidence. Good critique and summary of relevant evidence. "; criteria4[4] = "Principles and methodological approach described, but with weak, limited or no justification. Good identification and selection of relevant evidence. Acceptable/standard critique and summary of relevant evidence. "; criteria4[5] = "Principles and methodological approach poorly described, with weak, limited or no justification. Incomplete identification and selection of relevant evidence. Poorly explained / described critique and summary of relevant evidence. "; criteria4[6] = "Principles and methodological approach not stated. Identification and selection of evidence, irrelevant or inadequate. No description of critique and summary of relevant evidence. "; marksavailable5 = 10; criteria5[0] = "5. Discussion "; criteria5[1] = "Demonstrates an excellent knowledge and understanding of all major key issues. Sophisticated ability to integrate theory and real-world concerns (where appropriate). "; criteria5[2] = "Demonstrates a comprehensive knowledge and understanding of all major key issues. Insightful ability to integrate theory and real-world concerns (where appropriate). "; criteria5[3] = "Demonstrates an adequate knowledge and understanding of the important issues. Satisfactory ability to relate research and real-world concerns (where appropriate). "; criteria5[4] = "Demonstrates adequate understanding of the important issues with some gaps or inadequacies. Occasional limited ability to relate research and real-world "; criteria5[5] = "Demonstrates poor understanding of the important issues. Very limited ability to relate research and real-world concerns (where appropriate). Unimportant issues relating to the topic "; criteria5[6] = "Demonstrates little or no understanding of the important issues; Inability to make meaningful connections between research and real-world concerns (where appropriate). "; marksavailable6 = 10; criteria6[0] = "6. Conclusions "; criteria6[1] = "Exemplary conclusions, clearly linked to the topic. Recommendations /opportunities for further practice or research; appropriate and perceptive summary, justified by evidence. "; criteria6[2] = "Very good conclusions, clearly linked to the topic. Recommendations /opportunities for further practice or research; appropriate and insightful summary, justified by evidence. "; criteria6[3] = "Good conclusions, clearly linked to the topic. Recommendations /opportunities for further practice or research; appropriate and well-presented summary, justified by evidence. "; criteria6[4] = "Acceptable conclusions, linked to the topic. Recommendations /opportunities for further practice or research; adequately described, but inadequately justified by evidence. "; criteria6[5] = "Conclusions poorly linked to topic. Recommendations /opportunities for further practice or research; inappropriate or inadequate summary, not justified by evidence. "; criteria6[6] = "Conclusions not linked to topic. Recommendations /opportunities for further practice or research; unclear summary, not justified by evidence. "; marksavailable7 = 10; criteria7[0] = "7. Presentation of data, references, syntax and structure "; criteria7[1] = "Outstanding use of Tables / Figures, correct legends. Data presentation, exemplary and easy to read/ understand. Coherent and easy to understand. Negligible errors. Accurate and up-to-date citations in text. Reference list, precise. Exemplary. Very good use of English. Outstandingly organised and well-written dissertation. Module Handbook followed. "; criteria7[2] = "Excellent use of Tables/ Figures, correct legends. Data presentation, good and easy to read/understand. Appropriate citations in text. Reference list, precise. Excellent. Very effective use of English. Coherent and easy to understand. Negligible errors. Excellent organisation of submission. Module Handbook followed. "; criteria7[3] = "Acceptable use of Tables/ Figures, correct legends. Data presentation, acceptable and easy to read/understand. Appropriate citations; minor omissions in bibliography. Good. Effective use of English. Coherent and easy to understand. Occasional errors/ typos. Good organisation of submission. Occasional deviations from recommendations in Module Handbook. "; criteria7[4] = "Acceptable use of Tables/ Figures, some missing or incorrect legends. Occasionally, data presentation is not concise/appropriate/ easy to read/understand. Appropriate citations; minor omissions in bibliography. Satisfactory. Generally, acceptable use of English. Coherent with occasionally difficult to understand due to errors/typos. Acceptable presentation. Occasional deviations from recommendations in Module Handbook. Appropriate citations; minor omissions and errors in bibliography."; criteria7[5] = "Poor use of Tables/Figures Inappropriate/un-acceptable data presentation (e.g. using Table/Figure to summarise text to reduce word count; poorly presented data etc.). Missing/ incorrect citations; omissions and errors in bibliography. Unacceptable syntax. Poor use of English. Difficult to read and understand. Poor organisation and structure. Frequent deviations from recommendations in Module Handbook. "; criteria7[6] = "Missed opportunities to present data in Tables/ Figures. No citations/ bibliography. Unacceptable syntax. Poor use of English with frequent errors/ typos. Difficult to read and understand. Unacceptable organisation and structure. Major deviations from recommendations in Module Handbook."; //Scores..//////////////////////////////////////////////////// var myscore = new Array(); myscore[0]= "" myscore[1] = 90; myscore[2] = 75; myscore[3] = 65; myscore[4] = 55; myscore[5] = 47; myscore[6] = 22; myscore[7] = 22;