//set this to the number of criteria!!!

numberofcriteria = 6;
numberofranges = 7;

optionrange= new Array();

optionrange[0]="Select option...";
optionrange[1]="100-70 (Excellent";
optionrange[2]="69-60 (Good)";
optionrange[3]="59-50 (Adequate)";
optionrange[4]="49-45 (Bare fail)";
optionrange[5]="44-30 (Clear fail)";
optionrange[6]="29-0 (Bad fail)";


var criteria1 = new Array();
var criteria2 = new Array();
var criteria3 = new Array();
var criteria4 = new Array();
var criteria5 = new Array();
var criteria6 = new Array();




marksavailable1 = 10;
criteria1[0] = "1. Introduction outlining the importance of the intervention (brief)  ";
criteria1[1] = "Your introduction is clear and logical, containing clear definitions of the problem and intervention, relevant information on the scope of the problem and clear links from the problem to the purpose of the intervention, using up-to-date references and reliable sources. ";
criteria1[2] = "The introduction is generally good, containing definitions of the problem and intervention, information on the scope of the problem and some links from the problem to the purpose of the intervention, using mainly up-to-date references and reliable sources. ";
criteria1[3] = "The introduction is adequate, containing some definition of the problem or intervention, some information on the scope of the problem and some links from the problem to the purpose of the intervention, using some up-to-date references and some reliable sources. ";
criteria1[4] = "The introduction contained some definition of the problem and intervention, or information on the scope of the problem, or links from the problem to the purpose of the intervention, but would have benefitted from having more detail on the definition of the problem, or or information on the scope of the problem, or links from the problem to the purpose of the intervention, and more up to date references and reliable sources. ";
criteria1[5] = "The introduction could have provided a more detailed definition of the problem and intervention, information on the scope of the problem (e.g., prevalence statistics, consequences) and links from the problem to the purpose of the intervention. The use of up-to-date references and reliable sources would have improved this section. ";
criteria1[6] = "Very little introduction has been provided. This essay would have benefited from an introduction that gives a definition of the problem and intervention, information on the scope of the problem (e.g., prevalence statistics, consequences), and links from the problem to the purpose of the intervention, with points supported by up-to-date references and reliable sources. ";

marksavailable2 = 15;
criteria2[0] = "2. Brief summary of intervention designed in poster ";
criteria2[1] = "You have given a clear and concise summary of the intervention and the theoretical approach it sits in, entirely consistent with the poster (or an improvement). You have concisely mentioned and defined all key elements and you have given detailed consideration to how to monitor and evaluate the intervention. ";
criteria2[2] = "Your summary of the intervention and the theoretical approach it is based on is mainly clear and concise, and largely consistent with the poster (or an improvement). You have mentioned and defined most key elements and given consideration to monitoring and evaluation of the intervention. "; 
criteria2[3] = "Your summary of the intervention and the theoretical approach it sits in is adequate, generally consistent with the poster (or some improvement), with some elements mentioned and defined, although this could have been a more detailed or concise. You have given some consideration to monitoring or evaluation of the intervention, although this could have been a bit more detailed. "; 
criteria2[4] = "Your summary of the intervention and the theoretical approach it sits in could be more concise (or detailed), consistent with the poster, and is lengthy rather than a summary. Few key elements of the intervention have been mentioned and defined, and little consideration has been given to monitoring or evaluation of the intervention. ";
criteria2[5] = "Your summary of the intervention and the theoretical approach it sits in is limited, with little or no consistency with the poster, and is lengthy rather than a summary, or lacking in detail. The key elements of the intervention could have been mentioned and defined (certainly the elements your critique focuses on), and monitoring or evaluation of the intervention could have been considered. ";
criteria2[6] = "There is little or no summary of the intervention the theoretical approach it sits in, or the summary is inconsistent with the poster. The description is lengthy rather than a summary. The key elements of the intervention could have been mentioned and defined (certainly the elements your critique focuses on), and monitoring or evaluation of the intervention could have been considered. ";

marksavailable3 = 35;
criteria3[0] = "3. Critique of the intervention ";
criteria3[1] = "You have given an insightful critique of the intervention, with comprehensive examination of the strengths and limitations of the intervention and perceptive comparison and contrast with another theoretical approach. You have supported your arguments with reference to relevant literature, and given perceptive consideration of the application of the intervention in the real world, with use of examples containing relevant detail. You have employed counter-critiques as part of a nuanced argument. ";
criteria3[2] = "You have given a good critique of the intervention, with generally comprehensive examination of the strengths and limitations of the intervention and comparison and contrast with another theoretical approach. You have supported your arguments with reference to relevant literature, and given good consideration of the application of the intervention in the real world, with the use of one or more examples. You have used one or two counter-critiques in your argument. ";
criteria3[3] = "The critique of the intervention is adequate, with some examination of the strengths and limitations of the intervention and some comparison and contrast with another theoretical approach, although this could have been more detailed and balanced. You have made reference to relevant literature to support some points made, although some are unsupported. You have given some consideration of the application of the intervention in the real world with some mention of one or more examples, although this could have been expanded upon. Counter-critiques could have been used to present a more nuanced argument. ";
criteria3[4] = "Little critique of the intervention has been given; there could have been more detailed examination of the strengths and limitations of the intervention and comparison and contrast with another theoretical approach. A few points have been supported with reference to relevant literature, however, many are unsupported. Consideration could also have been given to the application of the intervention in the real world, and some examples could have been used. Counter-critiques could have been used to present a more nuanced argument. ";
criteria3[5] = "Limited critique of the intervention has been given; there could have been more detailed examination of the strengths and limitations of the intervention and comparison and contrast with another theoretical approach. The points made are largely unsupported; reference could have been made to relevant literature to support arguments made. Consideration could also have been given to the application of the intervention in the real world, and some examples could have been used. Counter-critiques could have been used to present a more nuanced argument. ";
criteria3[6] = "Critique of the intervention is absent or largely absent. The strengths and limitations of the intervention could have been examined and there could have been some comparison and contrast with another theoretical approach. The points made are unsupported; reference could have been made to relevant literature to support arguments. Consideration could also have been given to the application of the intervention in the real world, and some examples could have been used. Counter-critiques could have been used to present a more nuanced argument. ";

marksavailable4 = 10;
criteria4[0] = "4. Overall conclusion (brief), consistent with key points and considerations discussed "; 
criteria4[1] = "You have given an insightful summary and conclusion, which is entirely consistent with the key points and considerations discussed within the essay. No new information has been introduced at this point. Your conclusion includes an insightful and accurate summary of the argument, with a position statement that is consistent with the argument. You have presented implications that are entirely consistent with the arguments made and position stated. ";
criteria4[2] = "You have given a good summary and conclusion, which is mainly consistent with the key points and considerations discussed within the essay. No new information has been introduced at this point. Your conclusion includes an accurate summary of the argument, with a position statement that is consistent with the argument. You have presented implications that are consistent with the arguments made and position stated. ";
criteria4[3] = "The summary and conclusion section is adequate, with coverage of some of the key points and considerations discussed, although it could have been more comprehensive. No new information has been introduced at this point. Your conclusion includes an adequate summary of the argument, although it could have been more comprehensive and balanced. The position statement is generally consistent with the argument. You have given some consideration to the implications, although more detail could have been given. ";
criteria4[4] = "The conclusion is not entirely consistent with key points and considerations discussed, and could have more accurately summarised the argument, by being more comprehensive and balanced. Some new information or points of argument have been presented, which should have been mentioned in the main body of the essay and summarised here. The position statement could have been more consistent with the argument. Implications could have been considered. ";
criteria4[5] = "The conclusion is not consistent with the key points and considerations discussed in the essay, and could have more accurately summarised the argument, by being more comprehensive and balanced. New information and arguments have been presented, which should have been mentioned in the main body of the essay and summarised here. The position statement could have been more consistent with the argument or a position statement could have been given. Implications could have been considered. ";
criteria4[6] = "The conclusion is largely absent or is extremely lengthy. A conclusion that concisely summarises the key points of argument from the essay could have been presented. New information and arguments have been presented, which should have been mentioned in the main body of the essay and summarised here. The position statement could have been more consistent with the argument or a position statement could have been given. Implications could have been considered. ";

marksavailable5 = 15;
criteria5[0] = "5. Academic writing ";
criteria5[1] = "writing follows the scientific, academic style, with exemplary phrasing and choice of words, and no colloquial language. Your thread of argument is clear, logical, and easy to follow. The writing quality is of publishable standard. ";
criteria5[2] = "Your writing is largely scientific and academic in style, with appropriate phrasing and choice of words, and little or no colloquial language, although there are occasional typographical errors. Your thread of argument is mainly clear and logical. ";
criteria5[3] = "The writing is generally scientific and academic in style, with generally appropriate phrasing and choice of words, and little colloquial language, although there are a few typographical and spelling or grammatical errors. The thread of argument is mainly logical, although it could be clearer. ";
criteria5[4] = "There is quite a bit of colloquial language and some inappropriate phrasing (e.g., ….), and also a number of typographical and spelling or grammatical errors. In future, you may wish to seek support from the English Language Teaching Centre (https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/eltc), who can advise on academic writing for native as well as non-native English speakers. The thread of argument could be clearer and more logical. ";
criteria5[5] = "Much of the writing contains colloquial language and inappropriate phrasing, and could be more scientific and academic in style. We have also identified a number of typographical and spelling or grammatical errors. In future, you may wish to seek support from the English Language Teaching Centre (https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/eltc), who can advise on academic writing for native as well as non-native English speakers. The thread of argument could be clearer and more logical, as at the moment it is quite difficult to follow. This is something that the English Language Teaching centre can also support you with, and you may wish to look at the resources on academic writing provided by the 301 Academic Skills Centre (https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/academic-skills). ";
criteria5[6] = "The writing is informal and colloquial in style, with a number of typographical and grammatical errors, and could be more academic in style. In future, you may wish to seek support from the English Language Teaching Centre (https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/eltc), who can advise on academic writing for native as well as non-native English speakers. The essay seems to be a series of disconnected or unrelated points, with little thread of argument. This is something that the English Language Teaching centre can also support you with, and you may wish to look at the resources on academic writing provided by the 301 Academic Skills Centre (https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/academic-skills). ";


marksavailable6 = 15;
criteria6[0] = "6. Reference to relevant research and arguments ";
criteria6[1] = "You have fully researched and critically reviewed the literature, using references that are highly relevant to the point being made, and highly credible (up to date and from appropriate sources). Sources are correctly referenced and cited with correct formatting, of sufficient number and variety, and provide sufficient support for the statements made. You have used references entirely appropriately throughout, and your referencing is up to the standard of a published paper. "; 
criteria6[2] = "You have clearly researched the literature beyond the sources provided in the classroom, using references that are relevant to the point being made, and credible (up to date and from appropriate sources). Sources are mainly correctly referenced and cited, with mainly correct formatting, of sufficient number and variety, and provide generally good support for the statements made. You have used references appropriately throughout, although there are one or two unsubstantiated statements. ";
criteria6[3] = "The literature has been researched to the level of the sources provided in the classroom, but not beyond this. The references used are adequate for the point being made and generally credible (mostly up to date and from appropriate sources), although there are a few errors of formatting in reference lists and citations. References are of adequate number and variety, provide adequate support for the statements made and are used generally appropriately throughout, although there are a few unsubstantiated statements. ";
criteria6[4] = "The literature has been researched, but there are significant gaps. Many references are quite old, a number are from websites, and we have identified several errors of formatting in reference lists and citations. There are several unsubstantiated statements; each statement or point of argument should be supported with reference to an appropriate source. In the future you may wish to consult university resources on referencing (https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/library/study/research-skills/referencing). ";
criteria6[5] = "Some of the literature has been included, but important and significant gaps have been left. Limited use has been made of references throughout, and most statements and points of argument are unsubstantiated; each statement or point of argument should be supported with reference to an appropriate source. Many references are quite old and/or from websites, and we have identified significant errors of formatting in reference lists and citations. In the future you may wish to consult university resources on referencing (https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/library/study/research-skills/referencing). ";
criteria6[6] = "Extremely limited use has been made of references throughout, or no references have been used to support points of argument, and there is no evidence that the literature has been researched properly. Most statements and points of argument are unsubstantiated; each statement or point of argument should be supported with reference to an appropriate source. Many references are quite old and/or from websites, and we have identified significant errors of formatting in reference lists and citations, or the reference list and citations are absent from this essay. In the future you may wish to consult university resources on referencing (https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/library/study/research-skills/referencing). ";




//Scores..////////////////////////////////////////////////////
var myscore1 = new Array();
var myscore2 = new Array();
var myscore3 = new Array();
var myscore4 = new Array();
var myscore5 = new Array();
var myscore6 = new Array();





myscore1[0]= ""
myscore1[1] = 85;
myscore1[2] = 65;
myscore1[3] = 55;
myscore1[4] = 47;
myscore1[5] = 37;
myscore1[6] = 15;

myscore2[0]= ""
myscore2[1] = 85;
myscore2[2] = 65;
myscore2[3] = 55;
myscore2[4] = 47;
myscore2[5] = 37;
myscore2[6] = 15;

myscore3[0]= ""
myscore3[1] = 85;
myscore3[2] = 65;
myscore3[3] = 55;
myscore3[4] = 47;
myscore3[5] = 37;
myscore3[6] = 15;

myscore4[0]= ""
myscore4[1] = 85;
myscore4[2] = 65;
myscore4[3] = 55;
myscore4[4] = 47;
myscore4[5] = 37;
myscore4[6] = 15;

myscore5[0]= ""
myscore5[1] = 85;
myscore5[2] = 65;
myscore5[3] = 55;
myscore5[4] = 47;
myscore5[5] = 37;
myscore5[6] = 15;


myscore6[0]= ""
myscore6[1] = 85;
myscore6[2] = 65;
myscore6[3] = 55;
myscore6[4] = 47;
myscore6[5] = 37;
myscore6[6] = 15;