//set this to the number of criteria!!!

numberofcriteria = 6;
numberofranges = 6;

optionrange= new Array();

optionrange[0]="Select option...";
optionrange[1]="80-100";
optionrange[2]="70-79";
optionrange[3]="60-69";
optionrange[4]="50-59";
optionrange[5]="0-49";



var criteria1 = new Array();
var criteria2 = new Array();
var criteria3 = new Array();
var criteria4 = new Array();
var criteria5 = new Array();
var criteria6 = new Array();



marksavailable1 = 0;
criteria1[0] = "Summary Comments ";
criteria1[1] = "Overall this assignment is outstanding.  An excellent and innovative annotated bibliography is presented with a clear understanding of the area of interest.  Reference to health promotion theory is relevant and consistent throughout. A considerable and effective use of literature, beyond that supplied as taught material, has been incorporated.  You have demonstrated a depth of critical thinking and wider understanding about health promotion in this area. Excellent structure and presentation. ";
criteria1[2] = "Overall this assignment is very good annotated bibliography on a well-considered and well-justified area of interest. You have selected and justified relevant sources and told a clear story with good links to health promotion approaches and theory. You have used a wide range of literature and demonstrated clear critical thinking. Your assignment is well- structured. In order to extend your mark further please see the feedback below for areas which you could further improve. ";
criteria1[3] = "Overall this assignment is good annotated bibliography, on a well-thought through area of interest with relevant sources identified.  You have started to link and apply critical thinking to our sources. You have linked your sources and ideas to health promotion key theory.  Your assignment is well-structured.  In order to reach a distinction level (70+) mark please see the feedback below for areas which you could further improve. ";
criteria1[4] = "Overall this assignment is a pass. In order to reach a merit mark (60+) there are some key areas you could improve which are detailed in the feedback below. Overall your annotated bibliography is on an important and relevant topic for health promotion but your links to health promotion approaches and theory are weak and need to be the focus of this assignment. Your assignment structure and the flow between annotations could have been improved with more links between sources via critical observations. Wider reading on the topic and health promotion with more consistent referencing could improve this assignment. ";
criteria1[5] = "Overall your assignment has not achieved a pass mark. The objective was to write a critical annotated bibliography based on an aspect of health promotion using an area/topic of your choice. Whilst you have identified an important topic area you have not related this to health promotion research or theory and it would benefit from being further refined for the purpose of this assignment.  Your ordering and logical progression between sources is not clear and does not tell a clear narrative.  You have not related your sources to each other and have not included adequate critical appraisal. To achieve a higher grade,  you will need to make changes to the marking criteria areas highlighted below. ";

marksavailable2 = 25;
criteria2[0]= "Research ";
criteria2[1] = "You have provided an outstanding, comprehensive account of literature searching, including well-considered and justified search terms and academic search engines. You have selected an excellent, contrasting and well- justified range of evidence, with the majority recent (within the past 10 years). Your justification for use of older evidence is clear.  You have incorporated an outstanding justification of reasons for the area/group presented which is supported by relevant academic literature. ";
criteria2[2] = "You have provided a clear, transparent and comprehensive account of your literature search, including search terms and well-chosen academic search engines. You have made a good attempt at explaining your selection process.  You have used a very wide range of contrasting evidence, the majority of which is recent (within the past 10 years).  Your justification for the use of older evidence is clear.  You have provided a clear justification of  reasons for the topic area/group presented which is supported by relevant academic literature.  In order to extend your mark further you would need to... ";
criteria2[3] = "You have provided a good account of the literature search, including search engines and search terms. The majority of your search engines are of academic standard. You have made an attempt at explaining your selection process. You have included a good range of evidence and used 3 or more peer-reviewed documents. The majority of your included sources are published within the past 15 years. You have clearly attempted to provide some contrasting range of evidence.  To further improve your mark you need to only use data bases of academic standard and a more transparent account of your full section process of why you have selected the texts to be included in your annotated bibliography. You could also give better justification for any inclusion of older evidence. ";
criteria2[4] = "You have given an adequate account of the literature search and clearly identified the search engines used and the search terms used. You have included the correct number of articles to annotate. Some contrasting range of evidence is provided. To improve your mark you need to evidence how your sources were selected from the databases, why they were included, and the criteria you used to aid this decision.  Not all your search engines [Journal webpages/  StarPlus] are of an academic standard for this assignment.   A wider range of included evidence would improve this assignment, for example including more peer reviewed articles and/or a wider range designs/methods would enhance your conclusions.  If articles older than 10 years are used this decision needs to be clearly justified. ";
criteria2[5] = "To improve you need to provide a stronger rationale to indicate the importance of the area of interest, with references that justify your target group or content.  You need to to clearly identify your literature search strategy including which search engines you used, how you selected the sources from these databases, as well as the search terms you have used. Some of your search engines [Journal webpages/ StarPlus] are not of an academic standard for this assignment. You are asked to use between 5-8 ‘recent’ and up to date peer reviewed articles.  If old articles are used this decision needs to be justified. You should also try and ensure a range of research designs are included to demonstrate how you are looking at the area of importance from multiple perspectives. ";


marksavailable3 = 20;
criteria3[0] = "Critical Analysis ";
criteria3[1] = "You have provided an excellent analysis of the included sources and demonstrated clear evidence of a sophisticated ability  to critically review the wider literature to a very high standard. You have clearly shown the implications of the topic area in relation to the selected  sources, methods, and to wider health promotion theory. You have demonstrated excellent applied critical understanding of the theoretical and methodological issues, not only pertaining to the subject, but to the field as a whole. ";
criteria3[2] = "You have provided a very good analysis of your selected sources and have demonstrated some insightful critical appraisal of their methods and approaches.  You have critically explored some of the limitations and strengths of the research leading to thoughtful conclusions.  You have made a very good attempt to compare and contrast your annotations.  In order to extend your mark further you would need to... ";
criteria3[3] = "Your annotated bibliology demonstrates a good analysis of the resources presented. You have   synthesised the sources concisely and made a good effort to compare and contrast your sources both with each other, and in relation to some wider literature and health promotion theory. To improve your mark you need to... ";
criteria3[4] = "Your annotated bibliology contains some adequate contrasting and comparing of resources presented. You currently offer only minimal synthesis of information.  You have demonstrated some awareness of limitations of evidence. To improve you need to synthesise the sources’ findings in a more concise manner. You also need to start contrasting and comparing the sources presented to each other, indicating what their strengths and weaknesses are. This can then be compared to wider literature on the area of interest as well as relating it to relevant health promotion theory. ";
criteria3[5] = "Your annotated bibliology lacks any critical appraisal and your approach to writing about your included sources is entirely descriptive with no attempt at synthesising or analysing the evidence you have presented.  To improve you need to synthesise the sources’ findings in a more concise manner. You also need to start contrasting and comparing the sources presented to each other, indicating what their strengths and weaknesses are. This can then be compared to wider literature on the area of interest as well as relating it to relevant health promotion theory. ";


marksavailable4 = 20;
criteria4[0] = "Logical Progression ";
criteria4[1] = "You have provided an excellent introduction which maps the work and guides the reader. The assignment structure is excellent, consistently logical, and organised throughout relating one annotation to another to build a comprehensive narrative. ";
criteria4[2] = "Your introduction is presented with a very good mapping out of the work to follow.  Your assignment is well-structured and logical, with an organised bibliography. You refer to previous annotations so they build on one another and support observations with further evidence. In order to extend your mark further you would need to be more consistent and detailed with the logical progression of the annotations. ";
criteria4[3] = "You have provided a good introduction that includes a mapping out of the work to follow.  There is a good overall structure to the assignment and it has a mostly organised bibliography. Your annotations are linked to one another and you have made some attempt to bring in evidence from other sources. To improve your mark develop a more detailed account of the focussed population and the health issue it faces.  Include more literature from outside sources to demonstrate your breadth of knowledge and ability to synthesise the current evidence effectively. ";
criteria4[4] = "You have made a brief attempt to map out your bibliography.  You have adequately attempted to present a logical pathway through the assignment.  You have linked some annotations with an attempt to build on from one another although this is inconsistent.  The structure of your assignment could be clearer.  To improve, link your annotations to each other to develop a clear narrative through the assignment.  Bring in evidence from other sources. ";
criteria4[5] = "Your introduction does not adequately map out your bibliography and does not reflect work that follows.  Your assignment is poorly structured with no attempt made to link the annotations to each other.  You have made no attempt to bring in evidence from other sources.  Your annotations are haphazard with no logical path through the assignment.  To improve, map out your bibliography in your introduction.  Present your annotations in a logical way.  Link the annotations to each other to develop a clear narrative through the assignment. ";



marksavailable5 = 25;
criteria5[0] = "Focus ";
criteria5[1] = "Exceptional focus and/or outstanding comprehension of the implications of the topic area and selected studies in relation to health promotion knowledge, intervention and theory. Excellent use of social factors/ social determinants to consistently explain and demonstrate awareness of the wider context. ";
criteria5[2] = "Your assignment has a very good focus throughout and strongly displays clear links to health promotion actions/ interventions/theory.  You have a clearly Identified target group/area. You have used social factors/ social determinants to explain and display awareness of the context. In order to extend your mark further you would need to utilise multiple references to further support ideas and resources. ";
criteria5[3] = "You present work with a good overall focus. You have used some social factors to explain the issues concerned, but these need more depth and detail. You have brought in some key areas of health promotion and linked these to theory. To improve your mark provide a stronger focus of the main target group/ intervention.  Embed key areas of health promotion and theory more consistently throughout your work. ";
criteria5[4] = "Your assignment is adequately focused.  You have attempted to use social factors to further explain issues but at times these are poorly described/understood  Your links to theory are brief and may be inappropriately applied.  To improve, your focus is appropriately  linked to relevant health promotion theory, approaches and social determinants of health. ";
criteria5[5] = "Your assignment is poorly focused and biomedical in approach. It is confusing for the reader.  You have failed to mention or link effectively to health promotion. There is no application of theory or social determinants to explain and display awareness of the context.  To improve, ensure your focus is health promotion based with links to theory, approaches and social determinants of health. ";



marksavailable6 = 10;
criteria6[0] = "Style, presentation and referencing ";
criteria6[1] = "A well-researched and well-evidenced reference list. Extremely well presented assignment which is written in a fluent and engaging style. ";
criteria6[2] = "Your references are presented correctly. Your assignment has a very good style and presentation with strong cohesion and readability. In order to extend your written work to a level that is publishable you could write in a more fluent and engaging style. ";
criteria6[3] = "Your reference list is mostly in correct format with only minimal errors. Good style and presentation with clear thought to readability. To improve your mark utilise the online referencing guide to ensure references/ citations are correct without error. Your presentation and style could be improved by writing in a more consistent academic style. ";
criteria6[4] = "Your reference list is adequate with some mistakes. There is an adequate style and presentation with some thought to readability. To improve, utilise the online referencing guide to ensure references/citations are correct. Presentation and style can be improved with spacing, layout, and less use of casual language. Proofreading your work would increase readability and to minimise any errors. ";
criteria6[5] = "Your reference list has many mistakes and/or missing references cited. Poor style and presentation with little thought to readability.  To improve, utilise the online referencing guide to ensure references/citations are correct. An academic style of writing is needed throughout.  Use the same font and font size throughout. Proofread your work thoroughly to reduce errors and to significantly increase readability. ";








//Scores..///////////////////////////////////////////////////

var myscore1 = new Array();
var myscore2 = new Array();
var myscore3 = new Array();
var myscore4 = new Array();
var myscore5 = new Array();
var myscore6 = new Array();





myscore1[0]= ""
myscore1[1] = 90;
myscore1[2] = 75;
myscore1[3] = 65;
myscore1[4] = 55;
myscore1[5] = 25;


myscore2[0]= ""
myscore2[1] = 90;
myscore2[2] = 75;
myscore2[3] = 65;
myscore2[4] = 55;
myscore2[5] = 25;


myscore3[0]= ""
myscore3[1] = 90;
myscore3[2] = 75;
myscore3[3] = 65;
myscore3[4] = 55;
myscore3[5] = 25;


myscore4[0]= ""
myscore4[1] = 90;
myscore4[2] = 75;
myscore4[3] = 65;
myscore4[4] = 55;
myscore4[5] = 25;


myscore5[0]= ""
myscore5[1] = 90;
myscore5[2] = 75;
myscore5[3] = 65;
myscore5[4] = 55;
myscore5[5] = 25;


myscore6[0]= ""
myscore6[1] = 90;
myscore6[2] = 75;
myscore6[3] = 65;
myscore6[4] = 55;
myscore6[5] = 25;