Initial Summary: |
|
|
Aims: (5%)
State the resource's key aim and two to three objectives. The overall aim should be general and the objectives much more specific. |
|
% |
/ 5 |
|
Add instructions for improving: |
|
|
Content and Sources: (5%)
Describe the type of information that you would include in your resource, such as research findings, policy document, access to databases, patient-orientated information (i.e. about symptoms, diagnosis, treatments), information about support services, etc. Describe how this content would be produced (i.e. would it link out to existing web-based resources such as NHS direct, online journals, RSS feeds, newsletters, video and audio files, etc, or would you commission original content, and if so, from whom?). Your description of the proposed resource might include discussion of the following aspects: |
|
% |
/ 5 |
|
Add instructions for improving: |
|
|
Navigation and Access: (5%)
Describe the structure of the resource and what 'sections' you would divide the content into. Also describe how users will access the resource- will they have to 'join up', will it be publicly accessible or will it be hosted privately within a healthcare-related organisation? |
|
% |
/ 5 |
|
Add instructions for improving: |
|
|
Tone: (5%)
Describe the 'perspective' that the resource takes- is it 'empathetic' (i.e. providing information to fellow clinicians, consumers or carers), or is it 'authoritative' (i.e. providing information from clinicians to consumers or from policy makers to clinicians) or perhaps a little of both? |
|
% |
/ 5 |
|
Add instructions for improving: |
|
|
Appearance and Functionality (12%)
Discuss any issues relating to the appearance of the resource. For instance, will your intended users need large fonts, audio commentaries of written information, glossaries or explanations of complex medical terminology? |
|
% |
/ 12 |
|
Add instructions for improving: |
|
|
Quality Assessment: (12%)
How will you assess the quality of the information you include in your resource? i.e: focus groups of intended users, 'quality checklists' for health websites, etc. |
|
% |
/ 12 |
|
Add instructions for improving: |
|
|
Risk Assessment: (12%)
Are there any potential negative impacts that your proposed resource could have? Are these justifiable risks, or can they be mitigated? What security measures might be required? |
|
% |
/ 12 |
|
Add instructions for improving: |
|
|
Updating: (5%)
How, and how often, will you update your resource? Think both about adding new content and checking existing content for currency. |
|
% |
/ 5 |
|
Add instructions for improving: |
|
|
User feedback: (5%)
How will users be able to provide feedback on the resource and contribute to it? You might use wikis, blogs, chat-rooms, etc for this. Is the resource intended to be largely a 'collaborative' one, where users provide a significant amount of content, or one where users can 'comment' on the resource, rather than have input into it. |
|
% |
/ 5 |
|
Add instructions for improving: |
|
|
Future Gazing: (12%)
How might the resource develop in line with emerging electronic technologies (such as those identified in Units 2,10 and 11) |
|
% |
/ 12 |
|
Add instructions for improving: |
|
|
Reflection: (12%)
This means reflecting on your own learning during your work on the assignment. Having completed the report, what have you learned? For instance, what issues have you come across in developing your proposal that were challenging or unexpected? Has it made your think differently about health-related information resources? |
|
% |
/ 12 |
|
Add instructions for improving: |
|
|
Conclusions: (5%)
Provide a brief summary of the report and proposed resource. |
|
% |
/ 5 |
|
Add instructions for improving: |
|
|
References: (5%)
List all your sources, with web addresses where available, and citations in the main body of your report, in accordance with the requirements in the ScHARR Distance Learning Student Handbook. |
|
% |
/ 5 |
|
Add instructions for improving: |
|
|
|
|
Total: |
/ 100 |